Google is now moderating user's bookmarks and removing them. - lemm.ee
lemm.ee
external-link
Original Toot: https://strangeobject.space/@silvermoon82/110969122337810598 [https://strangeobject.space/@silvermoon82/110969122337810598]
Chozo
link
fedilink
282
edit-2
10M

This is misleading. Not sure if by ignorance or malice, but it’s very misleading.

This isn’t happening with your browser bookmarks. This is Google Collections, which is a shareable bookmarking feature, meaning it can be made publicly available. That’s why it’s moderated. It’s basically Google’s version on something like Pinterest.

https://www.androidpolice.com/create-google-collections/

JokeDeity
link
fedilink
-4110M

IMO defending Google is the underhanded move.

Chozo
link
fedilink
27
edit-2
10M

DAE GOOGLE BAD???

I don’t give a fuck if you like Google or not, but spreading misleading FUD is the real underhanded move.

There are plenty of valid reasons to be critical of Google. This ain’t one.

Zorque
link
fedilink
510M

IMO targeting someone you don’t like with antipathy regardless of their actions is a sociopathic move.

Otter
link
fedilink
5210M

Sharing misleading info means people are less likely to believe you on real issues.

Firefox IS better, Chrome’s meddling IS a problem. We don’t need to make stuff up in favor of that, and clarifying the point isn’t “defending Google”

big pupper
link
fedilink
2510M

Every single comment chain on this thread besides this chain are 100% wrong and operating on misleading information. I fucking hate how up in arms people get when they don’t even have the full picture - even the basics, like having read the fucking article.

Even so - it’s not an excuse meddle with it, whatever you call it. Fuck Google.

Hannes
cake
link
fedilink
610M

So if you have a collection with political targets and the folder is just google maps links to their houses with their names as the bookmark name google shouldn’t be allowed to stop you from spreading this?

Sure google is shitty but this feature is designed to share links with other people and sometimes those links can be dangerous so imho it’s absolutely necessary to moderate them at some level.

Depends if it’s illegal or not. In your case it’s probably illegal.

Hannes
cake
link
fedilink
610M

In that case they deleted a link to illegal content in their jurisdiction - so should be fine - shouldn’t it?

Lexi Sneptaur
link
fedilink
7510M

You should be mad about the things google does. I don’t think this particular thing is unreasonable though.

Why not?

big pupper
link
fedilink
4110M

They have a duty to moderate public-facing systems. This is a link/bookmark sharing system, so obviously bookmarks that are pointing to things that are illegal are going to be dealt with.

LoafyLemon
link
fedilink
-410M

They don’t have to, they choose to. You can share bookmarks on Firefox, but Mozilla doesn’t filter nor censor them Orwellian style.

big pupper
link
fedilink
810M

I’m pretty sure there are reasonable expectations by governments that you maintain adequate moderation, especially the EU. If Mozilla were to deploy a public facing system and not moderate it, they would catch hell from the EU and likely be fined out the ass.

bermuda
link
fedilink
510M

Orwellian is when company does thing I don’t like

LoafyLemon
link
fedilink
210M

No, it’s when the company attempts to assume the role of a governing body and delves into the privacy of people’s bedrooms.

big pupper
link
fedilink
510M

No, that’s when they’re fascists

bermuda
link
fedilink
110M

deleted by creator

  • OP claimed it’s his private bookmarks not facing public

  • the site doesn’t contain any illegal content. It’s just google being overzealous and intrusive

  • Google Keep Notes has a sharing note feature. You think it would ok for them to sniff what you noting and delete it if they didn’t like it?

  • one again - there’s nothing illegal on that website, nor is accessing it or sharing it’s address

big pupper
link
fedilink
410M

Let’s try reading the articles before discussing them, next time.

Chozo
link
fedilink
2010M

OP claimed it’s his private bookmarks not facing public

OP is mistaken. Read the email in the screenshot.

If you’re going to store something on someone else’s computer (Google cloud), they have every right to control what is and is not allowed on their systems. Don’t like it? Use encryption, selfhost, etc…

I would love to hear that from Google’s spokesperson.

sadreality
link
fedilink
-210M

This person fucks.

Chad comment although I agree with other person that this is not the worst of Google’s crimes.

Create a post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

  • 0 users online
  • 57 users / day
  • 383 users / week
  • 1.5K users / month
  • 5.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.44K Posts
  • 57.5K Comments
  • Modlog