The European government has spent a few years trying to break encryption. The results have been, at best, mixed. Of course, the EU government claims it’s not actually interested in breaking e…

from the less-safety-equals-more-safety,-say-EuroCops dept

Ah shit. Here we go again 🤣🤣

In the US encryption (source code) is protected under free speech

Not surprising

OK, but you remove all gun safety mechanisms. If you shoot yourselves in the balls, we encrypt everything back.

deleted by creator

Malicious compliance. Have Apple and Google remove all apps that feature encryption — web browsers, banking apps, messaging apps — from their stores for 24 hours. Demonstrate that this isn’t really a good idea.

They should agree to do that willingly. While they are at it they should break sign in as well and block outgoing 443

They’ll be accepting responsibility for every illegal act that’s preventable by annihilating the right to privacy, then?

firefly
link
fedilink
76M

@magnetosphere@fedia.io @Glass0448@lemmy.today

Looky here, we found this nifty thing called, ‘qualified immunity’.

Not in Europe, that’s a US thing.

firefly
link
fedilink
66M

You can have it now. We don’t want it any more!

What about the illegal, but moral acts?

That would require an appreciation of nuance, which governments aren’t famous for having.

firefly
link
fedilink
26M

@magnetosphere@fedia.io @Glass0448@lemmy.today @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com

Nuance? Isn’t that a racial slur? Mastodon is too based for me.

kingthrillgore
banned
link
fedilink
176M

That’s dumb

That’s a declaration of war on democracy and civil liberties

FTFY

The letter opens with an admission by the collective of police chiefs that they’re unable to do their jobs unless tech companies do half the work for them.

I suppose previous generations of law enforcement that were able to do their jobs before all this does not count.

To be fair: previous generations of police officers, back when most people used phones, have made extensive use of wiretapping (and current policemen still do, of course).

firefly
link
fedilink
156M

@ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works

Forty years ago police had to have a basic level of intelligence and they investigated. Now some of them just rely on arm-twisting and plea bargain threats to find any patsy they can to stuff in a cell. They can have no crime, no complaint, no witness, no evidence, and still arrest you, and the D.A. will offer you a plea deal for something that didn’t even happen. Your public pretender defense lawyer will tell you to take the deal. Don’t laugh… it can happen to anyone.

You seem to be describing the US system (or some other common law one… but I believe district attorney is a US-specific term?)…

IDK about other EU countries (I guess they are all the same in this regard?), but in my Italy the public prosecutor has zero discretionary power when it comes to indictment and must, per the Italian Constitution, proceed based on the investigation outcomes. So there is no “help me catch the bigger fish and I’ll only charge you with some minor crime” like in the movies.

So… yes, what you describe can happen to anyone, but it can’t happen just anywhere :)

firefly
link
fedilink
26M

The court system in USA is absolutely and irredeemably corrupt. Many prosecutors in USA are vile criminals and most of them belong in prison themselves. They have no respect for the Constitution or Bill of Rights that they are by law subscribed and sworn to uphold. They will use bogus criminal charges to affect or chill the outcome of an unrelated civil matter, to ‘shut you up’ in street parlance. People think America is free. It is an authoritarian hell run by delusional nutters. People like to scoff at that, until it’s _their turn_ to ride the courthouse railroad.

Sad but true.

removed by mod

Privacy measures currently being rolled out, such as end-to-end encryption, will stop tech companies from seeing any offending

Front doors also stop them from seeing things… is that next? What about clothes to conceal drugs?

Butt cheeks must be cut off so I can more easily inspect your rectum.

removed by mod

And how exactly do they think they’re going to break PGP and TOR without running an NSA-style racket?

Simple, they make it illegal so they don’t have to break the encryption and can arrest you purely for having encrypted content.

TipRing
link
fedilink
46M

This just results in deniable encryption.

I had no idea this jpeg was 40gig ur honor

That’s rookie numbers. My collection of cat pics is about 2 TB. Individual files are reasonable size of course. Clearly nothing can be hidden there.

Create a post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

  • 0 users online
  • 57 users / day
  • 383 users / week
  • 1.5K users / month
  • 5.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.96K Posts
  • 74.6K Comments
  • Modlog