Ms Luke said the nightmare began after her information was compromised in the Medibank data breach.
She said this was the only breach of her information she was aware of.
Medibank released a statement to the ABC saying none of its customers’ passwords were compromised in the breach, and it was therefore in no way connected to what unfolded for Ms Luke.
Ms Luke said hackers took control of her PayPal account, in a credential stuffing attack that affected 35,000 PayPal customers in December.
Credential stuffing is where hackers access an account by using automation to try out username and password pairs sourced from data leaks on various websites.
Ms Luke said over the course of two days from December 6 to 8, her PayPal account was used to make hundreds of fraudulent transactions.
She was then served electronically with papers from the US District Court of Florida outlining Adidas’ case against her.
Similar charges against her were also filed by the National Basketball Association in the District Court of Illinois.
In both cases, Adidas and the NBA were given leave by the courts to run the cases ex parte — without a requirement for all parties in the case to be present.
In court documents seen by the ABC, default judgements were handed down by the US courts and damages were awarded against Ms Luke of $US200,000 ($293,000) in the NBA case and $US1million ($1.5 million) in the Adidas matter.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 57 users / day
- 383 users / week
- 1.5K users / month
- 5.7K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 2.44K Posts
- 57.4K Comments
- Modlog
What in the holy fuck are these courts thinking
As a Australian woman, she did not present for Florida court. So the court defaulted judgment to the party that did
Yeah, she didn’t present because she’s not an idiot. And these lawyers and judges just did what they do best and fondled corporate balls, probably didn’t even look at the evidence or make an effort to find the truth.
The only way I could see it making sense is if the courts had reason to think that she lied.