Mozilla's pivot to AI first browsing raises fundamental questions about what a browser should be.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 108 users / day
- 435 users / week
- 1.32K users / month
- 4.54K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.56K Posts
- 115K Comments
- Modlog
The new CEO isn’t talking about the AI that’s already in Firefox. He’s talking about more AI with greater integration.
“Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.”
Ah, so speculation. I speculate that AI will decide we’re not useful and go all Skynet/Matrix on us. I sure hope I’m wrong. But if I try to sell you a doomsday bunker, you have every right to laugh in my face.
Who knows what Firefox will look like tomorrow? I do agree it’s important to keep options open, knowing about Waterfox, LibreWolf, IceCat, and maybe some others.
We here at $brand think your car should be more than just a car… that’s why we’re now including a panini maker in all models! And no, you can’t take it out of the trunk. Just don’t use it if you don’t want it, silly!
… Why did I read it as panty (panni?) maker?
I blame panini for being an uncommon word