You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 113 users / day
- 519 users / week
- 1.44K users / month
- 4.49K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.27K Posts
- 108K Comments
- Modlog
That’s a challenge, but even moving to a “generic” lens should help to reduce the identifiability.
but the problem isn’t “we can tell this photo is from a specific phone”, it’s “we can tell these two photos are from the same phone”.
Why would a generic lens be any better? These distortions are part of the lens design and manufacturing. Arguably, a lower quality lens would be easier to identify.
But not identifiable to a specific type of phone.
I didn’t see anything to see that these aberrations indicated anything about a type of phone? They’re unique for each lens…
Ah I see. Do non phone specific generic lenses exist? They all seem pretty specialized to me.
I know that a lot of the cheap Android handsets, which we mostly encounter as prepaid, have interchangeable camera bits.