Calyx with Micro G does have benifits, but isn’t quite as good as sandboxing, and also doesn’t have some of the other degoogling and security Graphene does.

Not sure you can, unless you’re using a Pi Hole. Vanadium doesn’t accept plugins to my knowledge.

Do filters cancel a notification? If so you can send them to a generic folder that doesn’t notify you.

And if you don’t want to give them an email that matters consider simple login. It’s owned by proton and will give you a few addresses for free.

Clients taking it into their own hands reminds me of delta chat. Basically the same thing but the client handles encryption and uses a generic email server as the chat server.

But any good client will handle encryption themselves (heck even “bad” clients will do that). As long as they’re not UK based and don’t neuter the clients for their UK users they’ll still retain proper encryption completely client side (outside of public key infrastructure which is a whole different topic).

Sounds like what you’re looking for is PGP/GPG. Been around for a while, but does the job well.

Also, I doubt most projects built outside of the UK (or Europe as the EU seems to be moving in a similar direction) will actually comply and backdoor their own software. As long as you have internet they’ll always be actually secure software to download.

I don’t think there is any proven results, but I think the reason the EFF prefers Braves decision is the philosophy that there are so many data points that it could be possible to link you to it using the ones not standardized by anti fingerprinting.

Like ways to incorrectly describe someone. One describes a guy correctly but generically. One describes a guy with a lot of detail but the wrong race and two feet too short.

Yes. Brave focuses on providing random data points each time it’s asked (e.g. screen size). A hardened Firefox will try to provide a generic fingerprint.

Apples to oranges more or less, I’m unaware of any proof that one or the other is considerably better across the board. Though my gut does tell me that randomization is a lot better in the specific situation of regularly signing in and out of accounts.

What, social lives? Get outta here with that nonsense and be a hobbit like the rest of us :)

Seriously though, if you’re thinking on a phone I’d reccomend just creating a second profile instead of getting a whole new device. The apps won’t be running when the profile is running, and as a bonus you can usually restrict the profile’s permissions. Also consider checking out web wrappers (e.g. frost) or PWAs.

On a desktop you can always just use the web version, bonus points if you auto clear cookies or have a separate profile.

Edit: if you already have a spare then that might work better than profiles.

Shh, nobody mention that half your apps are probably rendered in chromium.

Unfortunately there’s ads in Firefox too, and they’re opt out instead of opt in. I’m certainly not a fan of it, but outside of LibreWolf until servo becomes a thing I think should be right but we’re stuck choosing lesser of multiple evils.

I believe IOS was being forced to allow different browser engines by the EU so there may be more options soon

I doubt they’re doing anything to secerative in the background. Not a fan of Bat or their affiliate link scamdle, but also not a fan of Firefox’s ads, telemetry, trademark claims against Firefox forks, and accepting Google money for bad defaults - as I’m not a fan of Vivaldi being closed source and their adblock that doesn’t block all ads.

Brave is great for somebody who doesn’t know/want to configure defaults beyond optionally disabling Bat. If you can then Firefox & derivatives might give a better experience.

Brave is also Chromium based, but being a heavy fork it doesn’t hold onto the worst parts, making it more alright.