Admin on the slrpnk.net Lemmy instance.
He/Him or what ever you feel like.
XMPP: povoq@slrpnk.net
Avatar is an image of a baby octopus.
Well, at this point it is not entirely clear what Dekard will be. There are some details that point to it being a hybrid of both a VR optimised Qualcomm SoC and a SteamDeck like x86 system.
They are probably experimenting with various form factors, one of which could be a belt mounted box with the x86 part that you can alternatively use as a set top box in a more stationary setting.
You need an Ejabberd server and this auth script: https://f-hub.org/Solarpunk/ejabberd-auth-lemmy
Wait, who other than the grandparents actually wants to see the baby pictures? In my experience it is insufferable new parents that want to show their baby pictures to everyone and you have to pretend to like it to be polite. Maybe others just agreed to using another messenger just so they could ignore it better?
They didn’t open anything really. All they did was to allow companies to interact with their client API in an extremely limited fashion and only after signing an NDA riddled contract.
Its no wonder there are no takers on this “offer” and I hope the EU fines them billions for this malicious compliance.
https://joinjabber.org is also a good resource for learning about XMPP.
Some outdated ones do, but it is very easy to run your own modern IRC server that does none of that.
Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren’t there.
The entire point of the GDPR is to reign in those “commercial incentives” to spy on users for a little extra money from advertisers.
But I am starting to get the feeling I am trying to argue with someone who makes a living out of spying on users and selling that data to advertisers, which makes this argument moot.
or that all builders of web sites would do better not to make any attempt to (for example) keep track of which of their visitors have been there before
If there is a technical reason to do so, the GDPR explicitly allows doing so without any consent banner… and if there isn’t other than harvesting data to sell it to advertisers, then yes there is no reason to have that.
Sadly no, but you can self-host their stack and link it to an SIP voip provider: https://blog.jmp.chat/b/mobile-friendly-sip-gateway
But that will give you only a land-line based phone-number with no SMS support most likely.
No, but you can use Matrix through an XMPP gateway.
It gives you a normal mobile number (US & Canada) you can use for calls and sms from within your XMPP apps.
It’s relatively popular in DACH countries.
I use it sometimes. It has its fair share of issues, and the back end is not open-source, but it is OK for the most part. Main benefit is that you don’t need a mobile number to sign up.
But if you are looking for an alternative IM to use with friends and family, I would rather suggest XMPP, specifically Snikket.