• 1 Post
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 03, 2023

help-circle
rss

Losing privacy for convenience has been happening. We use GPS on our smart phones for better directions. We install listening devices to add things to shopping carts and to play music by voice. We install cloud security cameras at home. We accept free WiFi in stores which gives them our cell phone info and our location. We use digital cash instead of physical cash. We buy things online rather than going to the store. Every device, like a toaster, has a MAC address.


Yes, that is adding controls and using a database from the SponsorBlock server.

What I mean is a plugin cannot see the video. Like you can’t write

if(screen == adScreen) {
     then skipToNextSegment();
}

The plugin isn’t reading the video, it is getting info from a database. For AI or machine learning to work ad injection, which might change for every user, doing what SponsorBlock is doing is not enough.


Plugins can add controls and it can download videos, but plugins can’t interact with videos directly I think.

Maybe use the Youtube API closed captions and figure out the patterns for ads that way?


Looking online at similar situations people had their membership canceled by management. Other cases showed bring able to enter by a phone number, by their old tag, or ID verification. Looks like it happened for people whose app kept on crashing or a work phone that wouldn’t allow installs.

Which gym would just keep charging you if you said you can’t get in?


So if you can’t get in a gym because of a technology they added after you signed, they will just continue to charge you?

That’s what you think will happen?


This isn’t a magic trick. This is more about pushing and seeing how far they would bend.

Like what you said, if all else it’s a way out of the stupid agreements with gyms.


Bring them a dumb phone. Ask them to install the app on it for you. Tell then you are not buying a new phone just to use the gym.


Thanks for this.

When Google said they were stopping 3rd party cookies, I thought it was just a simple security setting. The new system, Protected Audience, seems like 3rd party cookies without the whack-a-mole approach of listing every cookie advertisers can take, especially since there is nothing stopping data collectors from extracting data from it, like what Mozilla said in the article.

Hopefully there are fake data dumpers or cleaners for Protected Audience which would reduce the effectiveness of this system but looking how the Chrome team treats browser extensions, I doubt it.


I don’t have this issue. I was just curious if chnaging DNS would fix the issue for OP.

Thank you for the link though.


Ooh! Great find!

Would changing DNS fix this problem then?


Maybe we can trick it forever that it is far away from a cell tower. That way the car has to start without connection.

Who knows, maybe they force you to use their app and after driving and connecting to the internet, that sends data back to the manufacturer.


This doesn’t differentiate different types of English but I will post it any just in case it is useful to you.

https://goblin.tools/Formalizer


>However, this bug caused some DNS queries to be sent to the DNS server configured on the computer, usually a server at the user's ISP, allowing the server to track a user's browsing habits.
fedilink


Sounds insane. Another law where the only people it affects negatively are non criminals.


Why do they not see that encryption can happen in any form of communication even if they do get their backdoors? Are they going to make all encryption illegal?