• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jul 21, 2023

help-circle
rss

Yeah, I think this was just a hard sell, and it works. My friend and I were apartment shopping and had already checked out a few places. Then we arrived to look at another complex and after meeting with them, we said we’d let them know if we’d like to move forward. They were very friendly, but pushy, saying “no, you don’t have to do that”, “you’re moving in here!”, that kind of stuff. Being naive and lazy, we just said okay and took the path of least resistance. Oh well, gotta live somewhere!




You’ve seen packing tape in real life, right? It’s not “almost impossible to see”, it’s shiny and obvious. As much as I love skirting draconian measures, that ain’t it…


In this comment section: S P E C U L A T I O N, presented as fact.


You may be right, but they literally wrote “from 2016”. So yeah, I read that as “Since 2016 onwards…”


You’re not arguing from a position of strength if your personal anecdote is performance issues, 8 years ago.


Somebody’s never worked retail. Yeah, there’s no way they’ll do that. Maybe at a small independently-owned store? Otherwise, there’s no way they’re even allowed to do that!


Well, there was no scratcher in the inventory, so that’s why he still isn’t back yet!


I know we’re all thinking it, but people paying attention feel that way because… it’s creepy, it’s not useful, it’s not something they initiated, and they don’t get a clear benefit from it.


At least Google stuff is usable

Briefly. I applaud your de-Googling. More of us need to do that…


They’re complaining about being recorded walking up to a door. Which will 100% always be someone else’s property and not public in the context of this discussion.

Why are you so angry? Damn. This is a privacy forum. So of course we want privacy! I’ll even grant you that a person who owns their home is allowed to record and archive every single moment of every single person who visits (creepy). But not every person owns their own home. As I mentioned, I currently rent, as do about 45 million households in the US. That’s the majority of all people under 35! So now that ownership isn’t an issue, is my neighbor allowed to record every time I go to work, get food delivered, see who visits me and when, etc? Their camera is pointed right at my doorway and activates every time I open it. Legally maybe, but that doesn’t make it right…

EDIT: Notice they’ll downvote me, but can’t back up their emotions with facts…



“Their property (and what it records off their property) is more important than your privacy.”


Not everyone has the luxury of owning their own home. My apartment neighbor has a doorbell camera pointed directly at my doorway that activates every time I open my door to go to work, get food delivered, etc. Huge privacy violation, but our doors face each other, so I guess that’s legal…


To each their own.

Totally agree. But hamstringing your own devices to potentially protect the data that never leaves your control anyway seems like a disservice to yourself. Again, if you have no data, location, or BT… What’s the point of paying for the device/service?


No, it’s not. That’s only if you share them using an online service that didn’t remove the metadata and also don’t strip it out yourself. That’s like saying keeping personal data on your device is against privacy! If that’s the case, just get rid of it at that point…




I’m not making an accusation, it’s kernel-level access. If I know where you live, have keys to your house, know your security code, can change anything in your home without you knowing, that’s a problem.

Why are you so dead-set on defending a company’s bad practices just because you like their game?


As mentioned, cheaters can already bypass it, so what’s the point? As for security, by definition it infects your whole system and has access to everything. That’s what kernel-level is.


It’s kernel-level control of your system, basically rootkit malware that you choose to infect your computer with. Keep in mind, it’s always running, whether you’re playing a game or not! By definition, it literally has more control of your system than you do signed in with your own private password. Ask yourself this: if the anti-cheat was compromised, sold, re-prioritized, bypassed by hackers or foreign interests, etc… How would you even know?

I understand that all this sounds paranoid, but remember that you chose to give it system-wide access! I likely hate online cheaters at least as much as you, but the potential security/privacy implications are far too great, not to mention the performance hit every single game with kernel-level anti-cheat suffers…


You don’t mind giving up your privacy and system security to a company for a single game?


Ugh. Even as a Linux user, I find people giving this knee-jerk response insufferable…


“Hacked”, people use this term way too often. If I create a card for Wingstop through Privacy, it’s locked to that merchant. So nobody can use it on Amazon or anywhere else, not even Privacy themselves! This is in addition to cards easily being created or deleted instantly.

the less people have your information the better.

Yes, that’s the entire point. Privacy has my payment info to complete transactions, just like any merchant would. But now, I never again have to provide my real name, email, phone number, or address, no matter who I purchase from online. I’ve “signed up” to local restaurants with 123 Fake Street and the transaction goes through…


I use Privacy and no, why would it? You’re allowed to purchase goods and services with legal tender. You aren’t legally obligated to give any of them your personal information.



your work

There’s a big difference between a giant corporation (that wants you to continue using its products) seeing every site you’ve visited, and your fucking employer, source of not being homeless and starving to death.


I realize you’re not asking for help, but this person needs uBlock Origin or something similar to block the entire element, not just the ad content…