An interesting tidbit from Mozilla’s latest privacy release (https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/21/firefox-120-ships-today-with-massive-privacy-improvements/):
The first introduces support for the Global Privacy Control in Settings. The privacy feature informs websites that you visit that you don’t want your data sold or shared. It is legally binding in some states in the United States, including in California and Colorado.
What’s to stop users from utilizing a VPN exit point in California or Colorado to force the binding nature of the request?
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 57 users / day
- 383 users / week
- 1.5K users / month
- 5.7K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 2.96K Posts
- 74.6K Comments
- Modlog
If you’re going to attempt this sort of thing then why go through CA or CO? Why not go through a GDPR country directly?
I should also add, this would require you to use a GDPR respecting instance. There’s a reason places like Amazon have
amazon.comandamazon.co.uk, etc. That’s not tenable for me, or most users.Latency.
What’s special about Colorado?
CA isn’t the only state with GDPR like privacy laws.
California, Virginia, Connecticut, Colorado, Utah, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Oregon, Montana, and Texas.
@random65837 @possiblylinux127 wait so my state has privacy laws?
If you’re in one of those, yes. There’s tons of websites that list what they are and compare them against others, but basically all of them (that I’ve seen) have all the basics like not sharing your info without consent, right to data deletion, how they can share your data when they do etc.
Do you seriously think these data hungry companies will care about your IP location and won’t fingerprint you? I doubt it.
Not all, but some will and that’s good enough. Security and privacy is all about layers, not guaranteed solutions.
That said, if you have “business” with a company, they are probably using your registered home address to understand how to deal with your local laws/regulations. e.g. If you’re using a registered google account and don’t have an address in a state that offers protection, its very unlikely they’ll extend any privacy policies to you just because your IP says you’re in California, for example.
OTOH, if you don’t have a registered address/account/profile and your IP is coming out of California, its possible some companies will apply stricter policies based on your preference.
To your original point though, yes, shady companies will continue to behave in unethical ways.
@mypasswordis1234 @fmstrat It is possible to beat fingerprinting with a vpn + delete all cookies + turn resist fingerprinting to true in about:config of Firefox.
The post is about saying “No, I do not want to be fingerprinted”, not “Here are my faked attributes that change every time I visit you”. What’s the point of sending a DNT header if companies don’t care and just do what they do?