Following the launch of the new AI-enabled Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, critics say Meta has failed to address lingering privacy concerns.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 57 users / day
- 383 users / week
- 1.5K users / month
- 5.7K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 2.44K Posts
- 57.6K Comments
- Modlog
Shocking
However I imagine its going to be much worse than smart doorbells. You will be a part of the people database whether you like it or not
They look decent, almost were interesting before I see they come with Meta baked in.
“glasshole” all over again - guess it’s too long already since google flopped with this.
I’d be surprised if anything coming from meta doesn’t raise privacy concerns.
What’s even the point if it doesn’t /s