Flock Camera controversy explained as viral Halloween ‘De-Flock’ campaign gains momentum - Dexerto
www.dexerto.comA viral campaign is urging Americans to turn Halloween into “De-Flock America” night and target controversial surveillance cameras.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 108 users / day
- 435 users / week
- 1.32K users / month
- 4.54K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.83K Posts
- 120K Comments
- Modlog
Didn’t the Flock CEO just admit (seemingly by mistake) that’s these cameras aren’t just license plate readers?
Link?
https://ipvm.com/reports/flock-ceo-stalk
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-said-cameras-don-t-161447111.html?guccounter=1
They’ve been saying they both are and aren’t for months now.
Who cares what the CEO did or didn’t say he’ll say whatever gets these cameras up around the world. We all know what this is. Halloween is the perfect time to cut them all down. Whoever thought of this is a hero
This was in response to the article which states that the cameras are license plate readers and conveniently omits that they can and have been used to track people on foot.