The privacy-focused search engine is asking the public where they stand on AI, arguing that AI features should always be optional.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 108 users / day
- 435 users / week
- 1.32K users / month
- 4.54K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.82K Posts
- 120K Comments
- Modlog
Nice advertising campaign for DDG. But I really respect search engines that do give you a choice whether to use AI or not, and decide other options under their hood. So good for them.
Exactly. This is the worst kind of corporate “In these trying times, we care” theatre. I expected better from DDG.
Poorly scoped, poorly defined, taps into vague “AI = Bad!” fears.
What exactly am I voting on here? Vibes?
This doesn’t increase my trust index for DDG. If anything, it makes me wonder about DDGs agenda.
Very Veridian Dynamics, DDG.
Fail.
PS: Self host SearXNG > DDG