Given that EM serves as a lense into our homes, would this provide an effective counter measure??
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 113 users / day
- 519 users / week
- 1.44K users / month
- 4.49K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.32K Posts
- 109K Comments
- Modlog
I personally like having wifi in my garden, but yes, in general it would make WiFi better inside. And painting internal walls would be silly.
Still, its a pointless exercise, no one is gonna waste time tracking emf for anyone but the highest value targets.
Absolutely; it’d be a waste of money. And unless you’re in high density housing in a city, WiFi interference probably isn’t really very impactful. I was just sayin’.
An outdoor WiFi access point would help with garden coverage
So would not Faraday caging my house, guess which is cheaper :D