A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 57 users / day
- 383 users / week
- 1.5K users / month
- 5.7K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 2.96K Posts
- 74.6K Comments
- Modlog
Sorry, what? Last time I checked AWS VPSs were very much NOT free to use, and I’m pretty sure the lowest tier is still more expensive than your average VPN.
Also, this article seems to be arguing against its own points: “you probably don’t need a VPN, but I have one anyway”…
My guess is they’re using an AWS free tier VM to host a VPN. It’s not a bad option but it can be insecure unless you know what you’re doing
It has a free tier, for 12 months you can run one t3.micro for free. That’s more than enough for a single user VPN. Afterwards it costs like $9 a month for on-demand instances (in the EU, it’s cheaper in the US), at that point you can either switch to reserved instances (which brings the cost down to around $3 or create a new AWS account to enjoy the free tier again.