New study shows that the default apps collect data even when supposedly disabled, and this is hard to switch off

New study shows that the default apps collect data even when supposedly disabled, and this is hard to switch off

people don’t even think about apple, when talking about data privacy. they look google, amazon and facebook differently than apple.

i’m using an iphone and i had to pay for icloud storage for like a year or two. than, i bought a pc with 2tb ssd and wanted to download all of my data from icloud and delete my subscription. downloading was no problem since you can request all of your data, problem was my 128gb data was not sorted and i had to delete all of my photos by hand from icloud.

i’m thinking about buying a google pixel 7a, since it’s cheap and i don’t need much more, and use graphene os with it. i can return my iphone when purchasing and 7a is gonna cost something like €100-200

I wanted to transfer video from an iPhone to PC. I usually back-up my Android device which has neat file structure and folder names. Viola iPhone folder naming is shit. I had to use “modified by time” to get the thing i wanted. There were so many folders with numbers.

possibly a cat
link
fedilink
8
edit-2
7M

deleted by creator

they obviously not on the same level as google and meta, and media writes often about apple not wanting to unlock a criminal’s iphone in a fbi case.

average user just knows that apple doesn’t give your data to 3rd party, nobody thinks about apple being the bad one here.

lemmyvore
link
fedilink
59M

apple not wanting to unlock a criminal’s iphone in a fbi case.

They couldn’t unlock it. If they could, or if the criminal had used iCloud backup, they’d have done it instantly.

What the FBI wanted was for Apple to make a “rooted” iOS version and update the phone with it, and that version would give them access to everything on it.

Apple didn’t want to do it because that iOS version could be used to get into any iPhone and it would’ve destroyed their image with their customers. Also, legally they could not be compelled to make a break-in tool.

Anyway, it was all for their own protection not for the principle of privacy.

possibly a cat
link
fedilink
4
edit-2
7M

deleted by creator

Create a post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

  • 0 users online
  • 57 users / day
  • 383 users / week
  • 1.5K users / month
  • 5.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.12K Posts
  • 78K Comments
  • Modlog