Also on Mastodon: @pedroapero@mastodon.top

Want to send me a tip? XMR:89oiUKyACFZ655sTikh42RF8wpd46EQDmbTQUQiHHRWFEatjp5xxj4tZBhMMfjC4X45qvq4EdEGXkBsdxT1kP9xyVia8mPD

  • 2 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Aug 10, 2023

help-circle
rss

It seems to me that there will be much less relays than there are AP nodes. Users won’t publish/subscribe to hundred of relays (if they did, relays would not scale). Hence more bad content to less moderators, and poor moderation.

Adding client filters would just shift the censorship power to those maintaining them.


Checkout the list of recommendations published by the Free Software Foundation: https://www.fsf.org/resources/webmail-systems



Visa Adds New Way To Share Customer Shopping Data With Retailers
Visa is rolling out new technology that will allow the payments giant to [share more information about customers' preferences](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-15/visa-adds-new-way-to-share-customer-shopping-data-with-retailers) [[non-paywalled source](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240515563838/en/)] based on their shopping history with retailers as it seeks to remain a top player in the competitive e-commerce space. From a report: > The data will be shared via the payments giant's proprietary "tokens," which provide an added layer of security between a consumer's bank information and a merchant. Shopping inclinations and other information based on past transactions -- such as preferred categories, like movies or golf -- will be shared via token with retailers with the consent of consumers. > "It's almost entirely blind to almost all consumers," Visa Chief Executive Officer Ryan McInerney said in an interview of the company's token technology. "They just know their payments work better." The sharing of shopping data via token is one of a handful of innovations Visa unveiled at a conference in San Francisco, where it's based. Visa, one of the largest e-commerce technology companies in the world, is finding itself increasingly fending off competitors seeking larger slices of the fees merchants must pay to carry out consumer transactions. Abstract credit: https://slashdot.org/story/428471
fedilink

Had the same experience with Lydia advertising their new brand name by email yesterday.


The entropy of otp codes is low compared to the seed’s. I’d never though about what that meant for reversion. Good point !


In actually decreases with time (by half every four year, unless the value increases equally, which is unlikely in the long run). However you should compare the energy per transaction, which is pretty lame (5txs per seconds or similar).


Sharik is very nice on smartphone: https://f-droid.org/packages/dev.marchello.sharik/ No need to install anything on the receiver side; handles Wifi hotshot itself.



I use Monero for donations too on a regular basis. From what I understand, the people accepting donations would no longer be allowed to sell them to professional platforms (silly as those are the ones KYCing).



It generated a suffix of two digits when I tried (you can set it explicitely but it is mandatory).


Pow does not limit spam in bitcoin. Fees do. Pow is used as a decentralized election mecanism to distribute the block production.


They will allow to hide your phone number from your profile, but what about your profile name ? This will identify you after your username is used. So you must also remove your name from your profile, this will confuse your previous contacts (I’m not sure if names come from profile or contact list actually).

I feel the options for phone number display are not sufficient to have several privacy profiles.


You would likely face another issue in that scenario: briar + hotspot draining your battery.


A phone number will always be required to limit bot accounts.


I don’t get it; if I pay my taxes in my country of residence, how is it illegal to work for a foreign entity ?

Why would I need a visa if I stay in my own country ?


> A programmer in northern China has been ordered to pay more than 1 million yuan to the authorities for using a virtual private network (VPN), in what is thought to be the most severe individual financial penalty ever issued for circumventing China's "great firewall." The programmer, surnamed Ma, was issued with a penalty notice by the public security bureau of Chengde, a city in Hebei province, on August 18. The notice said Ma had used "unauthorised channels" to connect to international networks to work for a Turkish company. The police confiscated the 1.058m yuan ($145,092) Ma had earned as a software developer between September 2019 and November 2022, describing it as "illegal income," as well as fining him 200 yuan ($27). Charlie Smith (a pseudonym), the co-founder of GreatFire.org, a website that tracks internet censorship in China, said: "Even if this decision is overturned in court, a message has been sent and damage has been done. Is doing business outside of China now subject to penalties?" Abstract credit: https://slashdot.org/story/420019
fedilink

Not sure why they used sha256 though, it mostly defeats the goal of protecting from bots (those can get access to ASICs, as oposed to regular users).


He pinged the local IP to check if the network card was up on his suspended machine…