Both softwares have graphs. You’ll need to be more specific than that, to help us understand.

Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.

Or I am missing some design problem here?

What exactly are you doing on Excel that Calc does significantly worse?

If you are exploring, I’d suggest giving Unexpected Keyboard a try. You might like it even though there is no autocorrect.

Webpage not accessible

Also I’d say start with the “easier” ones, for instance anti-capitalist people are more open to find ways to avoid surveillance capitalism. If enough of these people care and educate their respective circles, eventually all people will care.

And pro-capitalism people should simply avoid being under surveillance of someone who can potentially help their competition with targetted info about them.

Framing “them” as fundamentally different reinforces the mental barrier that your requirements and their requirements are different. Avoid it.

Does it include even one line of anyone else’s contribution to your open source code?

They have an agreement with MS, so they are definitely doing something there.

He is kinda whistle-blowing about the next level of evil. Up and coming.

Torbox.net doesn’t seem to be up at the moment.

will this be the final push to make p2p the norm ?

You are from a third world country; sharing device with 30 other people/accounts. Google will advertise to all 30 of you.

So, donation supported open source is the way ?

Bookmarked.

How much wealth does he have ?

Is he right about the start of the anti-trust action ?

ChatGPT ?

Signal’s use case is “authentic communication”. like when a govt person interacts with other govt person and doesn’t want a second govt to snoop on the actual contents on the communication, but accepts that metadata is public.

It is whatsapp for such people, without being whatsapp.

But then why would you use whatsapp either ?

phone number isn’t just any metadata; it is the anchoring data around which the rest of metadata is collected, and it is also connected to govt/corporate verified real identity.

why would anyone even claim to offer privacy around such an anchor ?

It does, to India.

Right to repair must apply to cars as well.

For an entity hat already has monopoly over violence, how difficult is it to claim monopoly over the collective will?

What how so? They already have taken a deceptive consent from every registered user to show ads profiled on per user basis, and serve numerous clicks on their website that offer ads or ad-like stuff.

What is your alternative theory of why they are doing all this?

They can’t do what they are doing here without an intent to violate privacy.

I have been using Hacker’s Keyboard since … forever?

Yahoo was the competition as far as space is concerned. Even today, it offers a whopping 1 TB for email.