• 1 Post
  • 24 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Oct 23, 2023

help-circle
rss

Old reddit got renamed??? Why’d they do something to something they secretly wanna get rid of



I’ve no idea what you’re talking about. What card? Esim is witbout any physical card, right? It’s a code you enter in your phone so it automatically connects to the provider.

I don’t think this is less “safe” as you put it. Perhaps a tiny tiny bit, but I don’t really know. Safe enough I guess


Maybe, although a good custom ROM may help you out there. Also, removable batteries are coming which may also suit your need of killing off all connectivity. EU may have mandated it


Yeah but the difference is is that you can buy esim more privately. You can do it online from your home. There are services that provide anonymous (ie via crypto) esims with mobile data, calling, sms, even roaming. If I remember correctly, Silent Link is one of them



How about E-sim? Then you don’t need to enter a physical store at all, let alone dance to the cameras


That’s so cool, but wouldn’t everyone need automat port forwarding/opening like UPnP IGD / PCP to initiate connection? Not everyone has this enabled




So how did you stop the referer header from doing that. I’d imagine it to be a clear simple command since it ought to be. Or was it not that straightforward?


So some WLAN devices just can’t make any DNS requests that are outside your LAN, correct? But what if they use a hardcoded ip, wouldn’t that circumvent everything?


Haven’t used it [silent.link] myself. All I know is that all (or some) plans they offer include only incomming-calls, not outgoing. But good point you make about delays. That’s important. Haven’t thought about that myself.

I’m not too versed in it myself yet. You were asking about these services in general, right? Since you wrote “voip numbers”. I’ll keep tabs on your other comment then


Bluetooth and gps permissions are linked? Why in the ass of logic is that reasonable? My Bose app required gps for connecting to headphones. I didnt see the logic


Silent.link is also worth considering. I think it also works for people in the EU.




Sooo safari is hallucinating or blacklight failed us


So no mention of “3 ad trackers”, “4 third-party cookies”? Which is additionally reported by blacklight


You using special scripts / add-ons? Or bare browser?

Yeh okay what does your super computer say about e.g. mathpix.com ?


YESSS! Exactly what I was looking for again. I can’t believe this site is so hard to find manually. Not the right keywords? Invisible…


I don’t think browsers are able to detect as much and easily as a dedicated website can. Anyway, these dedicated website detectors can also be used BEFORE visiting the site, providing more protection


What site can scan sites for trackers?
I once knew a site that could detect and list ALL the used trackers and cross-site cookies and other stuff of any site. You just had to input the site name and it scanned it for you. Now I can't find it. No site can actually list the trackers for me to examine.
fedilink

I know a bit about NATs, or how I like to call it, LAN, basically. But if you don’t even have a NAT to begin with and are directly connected (to your modem), then you don’t even need to open a port. Easy peasy


that’s so weird, that only one of two people need to have an open port. So the person with the closed port can still establish a connection, both upload AND download. However, this process stops the moment the other person closes his port, then NO connection whatsoever can be established? So we’re gonna pretend this makes sense? Or is it about initiating a connection which requires an open port? That’d make a bit more sense