Old reddit got renamed??? Why’d they do something to something they secretly wanna get rid of

Pgp?

I’ve no idea what you’re talking about. What card? Esim is witbout any physical card, right? It’s a code you enter in your phone so it automatically connects to the provider.

I don’t think this is less “safe” as you put it. Perhaps a tiny tiny bit, but I don’t really know. Safe enough I guess

Maybe, although a good custom ROM may help you out there. Also, removable batteries are coming which may also suit your need of killing off all connectivity. EU may have mandated it

Yeah but the difference is is that you can buy esim more privately. You can do it online from your home. There are services that provide anonymous (ie via crypto) esims with mobile data, calling, sms, even roaming. If I remember correctly, Silent Link is one of them

If it’s 1 euro a month, I’ll do it

How about E-sim? Then you don’t need to enter a physical store at all, let alone dance to the cameras

That’s so cool, but wouldn’t everyone need automat port forwarding/opening like UPnP IGD / PCP to initiate connection? Not everyone has this enabled

So lemmy.ml censors it as well?

What did he say

So how did you stop the referer header from doing that. I’d imagine it to be a clear simple command since it ought to be. Or was it not that straightforward?

So some WLAN devices just can’t make any DNS requests that are outside your LAN, correct? But what if they use a hardcoded ip, wouldn’t that circumvent everything?

Haven’t used it [silent.link] myself. All I know is that all (or some) plans they offer include only incomming-calls, not outgoing. But good point you make about delays. That’s important. Haven’t thought about that myself.

I’m not too versed in it myself yet. You were asking about these services in general, right? Since you wrote “voip numbers”. I’ll keep tabs on your other comment then

Bluetooth and gps permissions are linked? Why in the ass of logic is that reasonable? My Bose app required gps for connecting to headphones. I didnt see the logic

Silent.link is also worth considering. I think it also works for people in the EU.

The hack is Super Saiyan God

Glue and ductape

Sooo safari is hallucinating or blacklight failed us

So no mention of “3 ad trackers”, “4 third-party cookies”? Which is additionally reported by blacklight

You using special scripts / add-ons? Or bare browser?

Yeh okay what does your super computer say about e.g. mathpix.com ?

YESSS! Exactly what I was looking for again. I can’t believe this site is so hard to find manually. Not the right keywords? Invisible…

I don’t think browsers are able to detect as much and easily as a dedicated website can. Anyway, these dedicated website detectors can also be used BEFORE visiting the site, providing more protection

I know a bit about NATs, or how I like to call it, LAN, basically. But if you don’t even have a NAT to begin with and are directly connected (to your modem), then you don’t even need to open a port. Easy peasy

that’s so weird, that only one of two people need to have an open port. So the person with the closed port can still establish a connection, both upload AND download. However, this process stops the moment the other person closes his port, then NO connection whatsoever can be established? So we’re gonna pretend this makes sense? Or is it about initiating a connection which requires an open port? That’d make a bit more sense