• 2 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 07, 2023

help-circle
rss

While many devices don’t have ROMs built for them, any recent device should work with a GSI.

I just bought a tab s8, as I know Andy yan’s LineageOS 20 works on it from other users’ reports. I currently use it on my old tab 10.8 2019.


I have the same experience. People think I’m wacko for caring about this stuff.

Bottom line: you can’t fix stupid, and almost everyone is stupid.


ok, thanks. I’ll check it out, though I solved my problem this time around.


It did not. Whoops - I already answered this :)


This one got me to track down why it never asked for Wi-Fi after I interrupted and restarted the machine. The moment I entered it, the info was saved on the boot partition. Once it tricked me, there was no obvious way out. I turned off Wi-Fi in the BIOS, and that worked.


Neither of these worked. I know now that was because the installer had installed itself on the boot partition with the Wi-Fi info, so I could not go back and force it to continue without a connection. Plus, all addresses I chose it just told me it’s already used, try another.


I just updated my post with resolution thanks you you and others. I had to turn off Wi-Fi at the hardware level.


I’d rather not risk a hacked install if I can. I’ll keep this in my back pocket, though.



It does not. Once installed, I can “upgrade” by entering my license key. I will write the details as an edit soon.


I installed the most recent installer from microsoft. There’s only one and it covers all the versions.

Earlier today I managed to get it to work by turning off Wi-Fi in BIOS. I’m going to put a brief writeup as an edit to my original message sometime in the next several hours.


I’d rather not be forced to link everything that happens on this installation directly to me.-


That is what I am using, however I had to find a way to open it when I click on a teams meeting link. After I did that, it would not get past the initial splash. I eventually found that I have to hit CTRL-R one to three times to get it to go to the meeting. See, it took lots of searching and head scratching to get it working.


I’m not given the option. I’m going to have to wipe the drive and start over. I will try using Rufus this time.


6-8 is not a choice I am given. The installer for Windows 10 is a “multi-release” package. It contains all the distributions, so I cannot download the “pro” version or the “home” version.



a@a.com is already a Microsoft account. Please try a different email address”, so it doesn’t work.


a@a.com is already a Microsoft account. Please try a different email address”, so it doesn’t work.



Agreed. This is why I took the time to get comfortable with vscode. Still, in real world business development sometes it takes visual studio, and that is an excellent example.


I did that one before I wrote. It told me it was taken and expected another, so that no longer works. I’ll try the other one mentioned here and report back.



I saw that, I will give it a shot. Several other things I tried did not work so I am expecting it to fail, unfortunately.


There are times when I do need windows. That is why I kept the default install on my laptop and put Linux on dual boot.

In this case, my son wants to play bedrock Minecraft, and eventually I’m sure he will want to play games that don’t work on Linux.

For recent examples of why I need to have it around just in case, I’m interviewing for jobs and 90% of them use Teams. It took me a few weeks to get a solution to work on Linux.


That did not work for me, and it was listed for Windows 11.


installing Windows 10 pro without an account.
It's been a few years since I've needed to install a version of Windows on a PC for personal use. I have a license for Windows 10 Pro, but today I found out it is no longer possible to get through the installation without first creating an account with Microsoft. I don't want to do this. Does anybody have any way to get around it? The stuff I've read online basically ends up being create your account switch to a local account after installation and delete your account. I want a better solution. Would installing a much older version of Windows 10 work? The whole reason I got an msdn license back in the day is so I didn't have to do this. ### **Edit: 10/2/2023** I thank you all for giving me advice and ideas. Much I had already tried before posting my question here, and some suggestions and experiences led me to keep at it. Here's my experience for others who have a similar problem. I downloaded the ISO from Microsoft - `Win10_22H2_English_x64v1`. I used Ventoy to launch the installer. The first time I went through, I connected to Wi-Fi. As soon as I did that, it sealed my fate. By this time in the process, it installed the boot partition on my HD and saved this information so every time I tried to restart the installer, it always went through language, keyboard, then "enter email address". All the suggestions for fake values simply triggered "This email is already used. Please choose another", and that was it. I was getting ready to wipe the partition and try again, but decided to turn off Wi-Fi in the BIOS first to see if that worked. It did. This time it tried to convince me to set up the network and failed and I was able to create a local account. The way this multi-version installer works is annoying. It installed Windows Home edition, so I had to "know" that I could go to settings and enter a key. Once I put in the key, it "upgraded" to Pro edition, and I was done. Next time I have to do this, I'll see if Rufus works. It seems that will remove some annoyance. Either way, I will avoid configuring Wi-Fi until after install next time. I gotta say, I am not looking forward to the day when I *must* upgrade to Windows 11. So far I've been able to avoid actually buying a new copy due to my aging MSDN key. By the time I'm forced to "upgrade", I might have to cough up some cash for something I don't want, but am *forced* to own. It should be illegal. Anyway, now that I know I can still use my MSDN key to get an updated Win 10, I feel a bit more comfortable with re-imaging my Dell laptop from dual-boot to Linux only, then install Windows as a VM for these times I need to use it. Fortunately, that is increasingly rare.
fedilink

Wow. Something is actually being done to stop this. I’m shocked, and wish we had this kind of advocacy for human rights here in the USA.


Host lost blockers should be all you need for tnsumer VN covers IP safety. I use AdAway with Magisk to get whole phone protection. I use AntennaPod and never have problems with unplayable podcasts.


OK. So, what’s the worst case if they “catch” you asserting your privacy rights?

Based on that you can decide if it is worth doing it.


This reminds me of the times i and my friend had deep philospohical discussions… at 2am. During a weekend party, while drunk, in highschool.

Anyway, don’t go down any rabbit holes in which you can’t see the bottom. Walk away. While whistling, if it helps.


Look into JMP.CHAT. it’s XMPP, with a phone number that is gatewayed to PBX for voice, and can send/receive SMS.


I’m fairly confident that the encryption bans are only on those encryptions for which the government does not have the keys.

In that scenario, companies can continue working. The idea is flawed, of course.


I went with ProtonMail because it is based in a non-five eyes country… Plus it was launched by CERN scientists - major geek coolness factor. Recently upgraded to the basic paid tier.


most people just don’t get it
I included a comment that is a prime example of how willfully blind people are concerning the value of privacy. This was part of a thread about a mews post of a person who had his Amazon Smart Home bricked because a delivery person thought he was racist. It's a troubling read, because if most people really are this way, the fight for legally enforced privacy will fail. What do you think of this? --- >Do you think they could have turned off the in the first place if they did not have personal details tied to those devices and full control of those devices? Yes, assuming that we still need an input device of some sort. Because the input could make it give a different output, such as not running, even if it didn't know that you were the one it was blocking. Maybe that couldn't cascade to all of your devices, but certainly the ones that received the input that caused them to brick themselves. But, then again in a mesh network they probably could send a brick signal to all co-networked devices. >What if someone decided to use something you did in the "privacy" of your own home to blackmail you? Embarass you? Would you feel safe? I certainly wouldn't like that. Fortunately, those actions are illegal. The problem here isn't privacy, so much as it is blackmail. It doesn't matter to me, if a passive recording picks up me doing something embarrassing. The thing that matters is using the data in the wrong way, or not having controls around the data. >What if something you do all the time suddenly becomes illegal and you could be prosecuted based on surveillance footage inside your home? Well, I guess I'd better stop doing that thing or move. But, that is only marginally relevant to this case. If you are a criminal, there will be evidence of the crime. >Do you think they cannot access the video and audio from those devices? Sure they can, but passive access isn't a problem. The problem is using the data badly.
fedilink