Other accounts:

@Danterious@lemm.ee

All of my comments are licensed under the following license

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en

  • 1 Post
  • 6 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Aug 15, 2023

help-circle
rss

I guess my question is progress towards what? I mean no one’s gonna stop you its your own computer do what you want.

For me though it just isn’t worth the risk.

Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)


I mean sure but if you get hacked (which will eventually happen to someone if this is rolled out) just having the information stored in the first place becomes a risk. So I think it is better to not have it in the first place.

Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)


Seems like you have a better idea than I do about privacy so I’m probably not gonna be much help. However make sure that you use extensions that you trust or use as few permissions as possible because that also can be another vector where information can leak.

Oh and there was a post on here sometime ago about a website that show what kind of information it can get from your web browser so you could use that to check how much info you are leaking on the web at least.

Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)



But how do you verify if that information is actually accurate?

Like for example if a whistleblower says that their organization has something that can do xyz is it possible to verify that through zero knowledge proofs?


Is it possible to use zero knowledge proofs to verify journalism sources?
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/19547690 > After reading [this thread](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/10280094) I had the question on whether it is possible to verify you have certain information without revealing who you are to others.
fedilink