You disagree with that I don’t think Google engineers live paycheck to paycheck?
Oh, and I disagree with your assertion that you can’t get out of living paycheck to paycheck on 7.25 an hour. It’s obviously harder, because everyone has a minimum amount of money necessary just to live, but I’ve lived on 5.5 an hour when calculated as 7.5 hours 5 days a week 4 weeks a month (because that was easier to calculate; the actual monthly spend that 5.5 was calculated from was calculated at 30 days per month instead of the 28 the per hour calculation was made from (and if the per hour calculation was made more exact it would lower the effective remuneration per hour necessary to survive that month))
As long as it’s just text you don’t have the same insane needs for storage and data throughput as something using a lot of images and video. Keeping it contained to a small amount of topics for yourself also decreases how much it’s used and the corresponding costs associated. Since it then is spread over very many people the costs don’t get too wild for each person. Remember also that the “internet death hug” is a thing that can happen more readily to smaller disparate sites.
Exactly. The websites only need to trust that the client can receive the content, which the protocols define and we have protocols to exchange what other protocols the client can use. Just use a http://www.motherfuckingwebsite.com
You have https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-05-05/why-google-keeps-paying-mozilla-s-firefox-even-as-chrome-dominates (I haven’t read that article because I didn’t allow javascript there or something), and https://www.wired.com/2011/12/why-google-continues-to-fund-firefox/
Not necessarily explicitly supporting the claim made above, but the information is interesting.
I don’t think there are any witches doing anything in a congress.