@ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
banned
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
3M

The reason for that being that all the points I have put are fully valid.

The rest depends upon the persons inference.

  • Having a separate coder and a packager means there is a good chance that another person (the packager) is looking at the code.
    • And this other person is also most probably a separate entity, so if the coder is malicious, someone will know.
  • Then comes the point of the distro community being more open and fragmented, as compared to a corporation, that can keeps their members’ mouths shut using contracts and all

  • For the same thing, the pro corpo guys will say that they have a single entity to go to for any problems. And since they have a contract (which maybe a b2b client-provider contract), their interests match.
    • As opposed to some random chap on the internet, developing some Open Source thing as a hobby, purely for their own fun/ego/satisfaction.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Your points about enterprise support are fair but I was more talking about people that believe that FOSS is inherently less secure than something closed source controlled by a single large company (i.e. security by obscurity which doesn’t actually work)

Honestly I do agree in some ways support is better for enterprise products but at the same time companies could still use some sort of source-available license to promote transparency/security auditing while having the same control as a closed source product. It’s not FOSS but would definitely be better than having everything closed off

Create a post

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

  • 0 users online
  • 18 users / day
  • 139 users / week
  • 381 users / month
  • 1.43K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 864 Posts
  • 9.23K Comments
  • Modlog