Why couldn’t they just serve the comments to each client with the ad-adjusted timestamps already? The only thing the client has to request then is the comment page it wants to load, and some unique ID for which the backend remembers which ad version it’s associated with.

Grammarly has a terrible privacy policy, so you are right to be cautious. Unfortunately I don’t have any good alternatives to offer as I only use spellcheck myself.

That’s what I was kind of thinking/hoping based on the results, but I wasn’t sure if I was understanding it right. Thanks for elaborating!

Yea, I’m just using the browser on my phone, with Private Relay and intelligent tracking prevention on for all websites. I’ve visited it a bunch of times now and I’ve gotten it to count consecutive visits a few times, but if I just wait a little while and refresh it goes back to 1 and the fuzzy fingerprint is wildly different

On Safari 17 every time I visit the site it claims it’s my first visit, despite a trust score of 57%. Not sure if I’m interpreting the results wrong or ITP is just doing its job.

Nowhere in the post does OP claim that Discord’s privacy issues are China related…

ooooh of course. I should’ve just tried saying it out loud haha

…walla?

If this picture actually makes the rounds I give it a week before it starts being shared without the top half…

You can’t justify misinformation with “well it cOuLd happen”, it’s still perfectly capable of giving people the impression that that is a real thing

The irony that the bottom screenshot is literally misinformation …