Huh? What difference does it make to them…?

Wait, thinking about it, is it because name at gmail is easier to remember for them? Because gmail is the “standard” in their minds?

I used WinUtil and PolicyPlus to hopefully get rid of all that BS (at least until the next update…).

Lawnchair

I came back here specifically to say, “Oooooh ‘lawnchair’! ‘lawwwwwnchr’ that’s hilarious lol”

Different situation altogether.

I don’t really care whether you benefit in any way from my picture, published or not, for profit or not. If I don’t want you to have it, you don’t get it. What gives you the right to take my picture? Besides, why do you even want it if you’re not using it for something?

You can use public spaces all you like, you do not get to use my face however you like.

remove even more of our liberty to use public space (which is supposed to be ours).

I mean, your freedom to record in public ends where my freedom to not be recorded in public starts.

The way I understand it is that if anyone complains, you’d also have to prove that you didn’t record and the device has never had the ability to create a permanent record. Which seems difficult.

Okay, but what if I depict security as a pug?

What I’m saying is I’m having trouble with the initial premise, not necessarily the conclusion.

Out of date cache makes sense although I don’t think I’ve seen any system app ever above 3 stars (that’s why I even checked the Playstore page). Deleting the comment to not further propagate my false assumptions.

(Edit: There were two screenshots here, showing wildly different ratings for the app on the DuckDuckGo results page and the Playstore itself. The comment below kindly reminded me that DDG doesn’t update in real time. Duh. I apologise for posting too quickly.)

MySpace was way smaller than Facebook, it wasn’t even available where I am for most of its (meaningful) existence (I never had a MySpace despite being the exact target age range).