Google has a massive leg up in its technology and use cases so everyone uses it. The guy described it as a “1%” problem (as in the last percent of use cases that are hard to add to the app) and Google doesn’t have as many of those.

Why are you asking for their consent? You’re using their personal data on the basis of your legitimate interest.

Hi. That is incorrect. Sorry.

You don’t need to be a lawyer to say something is illegal. In this instance I’m talking about the antitrust case in the 90s against Microsoft which declared that restricting features of desktop OSes to certain apps to be illegal.

If edge is able to do it then this is illegal.

Can edge do it?

The politicians in Arizona

Which ones? The republican minority?

I hate these “news” articles which just summarize something else freely available on the Internet.

Why the fuck is this an article and why the FUCK is this a post??

And that.

Oh yes the “Matrix ‘leaks’ metadata” argument. It’s needed for federation. If you need full metadata protection your ONLY options are Signal and Session.

What’s wrong with Matrix’s encryption?

You don’t need it right up until you need it.

This is most people’s reaction to using Windows for any reason.

YES

FIREFOX

The article doesn’t say it is used for training data, it’s to “personalize” the “ai” to you. Not that I believe that for a second.

Yes.

We need an antitrust law that defines a monopoly by size/revenue of company statically by percent of US GDP, US wealth, or revenue in a particular industry. Not something g that allows the “well it feels fine” kind of defense these companies can pull.

That webpage has an uncrossable pop-up that shows me the button to save the article. It covers up the majority of the first paragraph.

But that’s not possible. It has to have some kind of 64 bit binary. It uses well over 4GiB of RAM.

How

Wait what? TF2 is 32 bit?

This is what Mozilla should be doing.