The comments around the under 16 media ban seem to be missing a salient point.
In order to determine if a user is under 16, you need to determine that for every single user … including you!
This means that your personal data will be harvested in order to determine if you are over 16 or not.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 113 users / day
- 519 users / week
- 1.44K users / month
- 4.49K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.3K Posts
- 109K Comments
- Modlog
How is it being enforced in Australia?
A webcam photo by the website or a specific third party service, ID verification through a “trusted third party” process, or a checkbox to confirm age?
How much information does the website get over and above “user is over 16 years old”, and how much does the government get, if any?
Explain your reasoning, please.
They’ll use machine learning to determine based on your behaviour if you’re under 16, then they’ll ask for proof of age. They are required to have multiple options and none of them are allowed to be a checkbox. Sites are also supposed to take measures against circumvention by VPN whatever that means. You can easily circumvent this by not creating an account, unless you rely on the YouTube subscription feed like I do (though I’ve got a fallback now).
I personally support the idea of restricting social media, but banning accounts is the complete opposite of what’s needed. The algorithm should be what’s banned.
Good luck with using AI. The training dataset will be polluted, and so will the data of individual accounts.
My TV is signed into YouTube as me, but all my kids use it to watch Minecraft videos. Google probably knows my age by now, and all this will get flagged as typical viewing for a millenial.
Thank you for making my point.
We know very little beyond:
There are to my knowledge no third party providers approved for this legislation. The process to assess actual implementation details started in July 2025, and the results thus far are underwhelming to put it mildly, you might call it a shitshow.
Below is the official sum total of what we know, most of it motherhood statements and “coming soon”.
https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/industry-regulation/social-media-age-restrictions
Media commentary wants to “protect the children”, but have no idea how you might do so, let alone consider the implications or implementation details.
Source: I’m an ICT professional with 40+ years experience.