Calls logs, messages and GPS data were pulled from the in-car system to prosecute the driver. Read more at straitstimes.com.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 57 users / day
- 383 users / week
- 1.5K users / month
- 5.7K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 2.96K Posts
- 74.6K Comments
- Modlog
I agree that does sound safe but I can’t trust the cops with a record of everywhere I’ve been or some kind of tracking system.
#alwaysbecriming
I think a good compromise would be the car only reporting you if you cross the speed limit. But then, you’d have to take the manufacturer’s word for it.
I will not take any word for it. Nobody is going to want to a drive snitch car, let’s be real.
Sweet, I can still text as much as I want that way. Because speeding is the only issue, right?
Inb4 cars are required to jam phone signal when in use.
You’re taking the manufacturer’s word for it right now. They already have all the required components built in, GPS, antenna and computer.